Thursday, July 18, 2019

Cardboard Finance - Do You Set or Keep a Hobby Budget?

*Because every post is better with a card included, and I wanted an excuse to show this one again

Collecting should be about fun, first and foremost.  While I agree with that whole-heartedly, the reality is that there are many underlying factors to enjoying this hobby of ours.  Whether we like it or not, one of the most prevalent and critical is money.  Except for rare cases, like this wonderful blogging community of ours, most of us aren't running around scooping up the cards we're looking for at absolutely no cost.  For better or worse, money is at the root of much of what we do as collectors.

While I make every effort not to let money dictate my life, I am admittedly a nerd (should not be a surprise given that I write a baseball card blog) and I find finance a somewhat interesting topic generally speaking.  I've got some ideas that I plan to turn into a short series of posts here on the blog exploring the link between funding and our wonderful hobby, under the title Cardboard Finance.

For the first post in the series, we'll discuss one of the most obvious intersections between these two topics...card collecting (or, insert hobby name here) budgets!

I'm confident that, like nearly everything else in our hobby, there will be a wide range of opinions and approaches to this topic.  For every collector out there who has no sense of a budget whatsoever and simply buys whatever they fancy, I'm willing to bet there's another one on the opposite end of the spectrum that strictly limits their spending and tracks every penny.

For me personally, I've gone through two different phases/approaches with respect to budgeting since I returned to collecting about a dozen years ago now.  Let's take a quick look at each...

Approach #1 - Hard Limit on Hobby Spending Each Paycheck

From the point when I re-entered the hobby in 2007, through the end of last year, this was my method of hobby budgeting.  I'd determine a maximum amount of money that I was comfortable and willing to spend on cards each paycheck, and keep a tally of my purchases in order to cut myself off if and when I reached that maximum.


To me, a budget has to be very simple to keep up with or I'll quickly abandon it, so I decided to track this in a basic notepad file on my computer.  The snippet above gives you the general idea, and you can see how I did with my mid-April 2017 paycheck.

Make a purchase, note the dollar amount rounded to an even dollar for simplicity, with a brief description of the item.  At the bottom tally them all up, tally up any shipping costs (since much of what I buy is online), then add those two together and you've got my total spend for the pay period.

I've got two sections like this per month, twelve months a year, going back well over a decade in my file now.  This method worked fairly well for me for a long time.  Some paychecks I'd admittedly go a little over budget, others I'd come in under, but what was important was that I was aware of what I was spending.  Also, it's kind of neat to be able to scroll back through the file and recall some of my purchases from long ago, or see how my hobby spending is trending over time.

What I didn't like about the approach as time wore on was the rigidity of it.  I'd typically try to limit myself to between $50 and $75 a check, or $100 to $150 a month, on cards and related expenses.  If I wanted to make a big purchase, or went a little wild one month, I'd feel a little guilty.  On the other side of the coin, if I stayed well under budget it felt great, but also felt like I missed out on some more potential fun acquisitions.

After a long time operating under this model, I made a change at the beginning of 2019 that I've been pleased with so far...

Approach #2 - Invest or Save $1 for Every $1 Spent on Cards

The title pretty much says it all, but let me elaborate a little.  Instead of keeping a strict monthly or twice-monthly spending limit, I loosened things up a bit.  First and foremost, I moved to tracking expenses by the month instead of by the paycheck, cutting my "boring book-keeping/reconciliation process" down from 24 times a year to 12.

Secondly, I decided on an approach that would greatly simplify things, give me much more flexibility at the same time, but still keep me honest and feeling good about the amount of money that I'm spending on my hobby.

The rules are simple, I can in theory spend as much as I want on sports cards.  However, every dollar that I spend on the hobby requires that I save an equal amount.  That can come in the form of putting it in a savings account, or investing in the stock market; either is fine so long as I'm saving.  To clarify, this is out of my take home pay.  Money that comes out of my paycheck pre-tax for my work 401k retirement fund doesn't factor in here at all.


Here's a snippet of a month under the new model, last month in fact.  Only takes me a minute to note the date, description and amount whenever I make a purchase.  End of the month I tally it up, and ensure that I saved or invested an equal amount during that same stretch (in the case of June I deposited the $65 into my Stash app, and bought fractional shares of both Paypal and Amazon!).

I informally keep an eye on it throughout the month to make sure I'm generally on track, but if I end up slightly behind when the month ends I simply don't allow myself to purchase any cards the next month until I've "paid the previous month off" by investing or saving what I needed to break even.

I'm loving this approach so far I have to say.  It's actually motivated me to, in most cases, spend less money per month than I was under my former model.  As a side effect, I'm learning a ton about investing, and it feels great to watch my savings build up at the same time that my collection does.  I'm intrigued by the "unlimited potential" of this model and the flexibility to pick up some really big cards if I can stay patient.  So much so that it has motivated me to start selling off some parts of my collection that I'm not as keen on anymore in order to raise more money for new cards and for investing (the subject of a future Cardboard Finance post).

I also dropped the tracking of shipping costs in this new model.  They were kind of a pain to keep track of, and at the end of the day the hobby is supposed to be enjoyable.  If something's bothering you about your budget, or any other aspect of your collecting for that matter, just don't do it!  I feel that I'm being responsible enough with my purchases in this scenario that if I don't account for a few bucks in shipping each month, so be it.

--------------------------------------

So, there's my two cents on budgeting in our hobby, and a little overview of the two approaches I've used over time.  How about you?  Do you have a collecting budget, or would having one sap some of the innocence and enjoyment out of the hobby for you?  If you do have a budget, how does yours operate compared to the approaches I've used and outlined above?

If someone asked you how much money you spend on sports cards, how would you answer the question?  I'd love to hear your opinion in the comments below, or even better if you have your own blog I'd love to read an entire post on the topic!

Monday, July 15, 2019

One Card Post - Back in the Saddle

What:  1960 Topps #71 - Marty Keough
Where:  COMC
How Much?:  $.50

Why?:  I was off work last week on vacation, and decided to make it a vacation from cards and the blog as well.  Spent a lot of time with friends, outdoors, and enjoyed a few amazing concerts.  Also took a road trip to Saratoga Springs, which was pretty cool.  All in all, a good week.  It's a little tough getting back on the horse here, so I'll go with a one card post here tonight.

Red Sox team set need from the '60s for two quarters?  Bent corner or not, I'll take that deal any time!


Saturday, July 6, 2019

Scratchin' that Itch - Even More Re-pack Packs

When I last left off with the contents of the 100-pack re-pack I got from Wal-Mart online for $40, I was 61 packs in.  Let's tear into another batch of 20 today...

1989 Bowman, 1989 Topps, 1991 Upper Deck, 2014 Topps and 2007 Upper Deck.  Oh boy.  The 2014 Topps pack was actually the stinker of the group, don't have a single card to show from that one.  The other four at least yielded something of interest...

Even the lowly 1989 Topps pack resulted in a nice, new Cal Ripken.  Given that he was a childhood favorite, it's really inexcusable that I don't have the complete run of Cal's flagship Topps cards by now.  At least I'm one closer.

This Carlos Quintana spilled out of that pack as well, and it turns out it's a need for my Red Sox collection.  Can't beat that!

1989 Bowman is generally detested among collectors, due in part to its large size, and in part to its uninspiring photography.  There are some diamonds in the rough though, like this Barry Bonds card that I plan on keeping.

I also got this Jackie Robinson reprint.  I've got a thing for 1950 Bowman, and Jackie's card from that set is an absolute dream card of mine.  For now though, this reprint will have to do.

The 1991 Upper Deck pack lacked any real star power, but it did yield a new Red Sox card...

...and some of the stellar photography that Upper Deck is known for.

I don't plan to keep the Riles or the Girardi, in fact I think I already shipped them away, but included the scans here because even though they don't fit in my collection they're both really nice shots.

The 2007 Upper Deck pack resulted in a new Red Sox card also!  I really can't complain about the number of additions to my team collection that have come from this lot so far.

Next batch of five!  Once again I did better with the older stuff here.  The 2013 Topps Series 1 and 2, and 2012 Archives packs contained nothing at all that I plan on keeping.

2005 Donruss had this Manny Ramirez inside though, yet another new Red Sox card.

1990 Fleer had a couple of big names on each side of the ball, with power-hitter Mark McGwire...

...and first-ballot HOF hurler Tom Glavine!

The next batch of five is all about the Topps flagship, with a pack of 2008, Series 1 and 2 from 2013, a 2015 Series 1 and a 2017 Series 2.

My streak of new Red Sox cards continued here, with the 2017 pack providing a card of somewhat obscure reliever Tyler Thornburg.

Also of note, a RC of former Red Sox prospect Manny Margot.

My lone insert in the 2008 pack was this Year in Review card, and once again a new Red Sox card.  I truly think I'm beating the odds at this point not only in pulling so many Red Sox, but in pulling so many Red Sox that I didn't happen to already have.

I've nearly completed the 2015 Topps set at this point, so I was psyched to score one of the few remaining cards I was missing with this Juan Lagares Future Stars.

Even 2013 Topps resulted in something at least interesting this time around, with surefire future HOFer Adrian Beltre.

Final five packs, three 2015 Topps and two 2013 Topps.  Guess what happened here?  Yup, I got skunked.  Not a single card I plan on keeping out of any of these five packs.

81 packs into the lot now, and I've decided to keep 64 cards in my collection at this point.  That means I've payed about 62 cents per card I've kept so far, but I still have nearly 20 packs to go and that doesn't factor in the enjoyment of ripping all this wax either (or the tremendous amount of cards I was able to ship to others).

I'll probably try to put this lot to rest with one more installment soon.  Thanks for stopping by!

Friday, July 5, 2019

4,000 Red Sox and Counting!

I hinted earlier this week that I had another amazing package of Red Sox to feature from my hobby friend John Miller.  Well, I've gotten them all scanned and added to my collection proper on The Trading Card Database, and I was pleased to find out that this particular delivery brought me to over 4,000 Red Sox cards and counting on the site!  That puts me within the top 40 largest collections of the team on the site, though I still have quite a ways to go to get the remainder of my Red Sox entered in.

As usual, John was all over the map with the contents of the package, including some under-sized Topps stickers.

One thing nearly every card had in common though was that it was new to me!

Clay Buchholz rounds out the sticker portion of the package, then we head into...

...these odd "Limited Edition" parallels of the 2000 Topps set.  Anyone know the story behind these?  They look exactly like the standard Topps cards from this year, but have a small foil-print Limited Edition stamp at the very bottom of the photo above the player's name.

I'm wondering if they were maybe some type of special cards that were only available as a complete factory set?  I want to say Topps does something along those lines now, but I'm not familiar enough with the latest trends in the hobby to be sure.

In any event, I got a nice grouping of these, including some examples like Jose Offerman here that remind me how nice a set 2000 Topps could be.

In the interest of preventing this post from getting any longer than it already is...

...I'm going to cut it here on these parallels.  There were at least a dozen of them in the envelope though!

Why am I showing 1992 Topps cards here, when I picked up a factory set for cheap coin many years back?

Because these are 1992 Topps Traded cards!

I'm guessing John may have busted a Traded set open, sorted by team and mailed them out.

I say that because the four that I received in this package constitute a complete Red Sox team set!  How cool is that?

As if that weren't enough, I got a good chunk of the 1994 Topps Traded team set as well.

1994 was right smack in the middle of my childhood collecting period, and I was pretty rabid about baseball at the time.  I never had access to these Traded sets though, so it's somewhat jarring to see cards like this that I'm completely unfamiliar with despite them being designs that I'm very familiar with.

An awesome injection of '90s right there.  That grouping makes me want to get my act together and figure out exactly what Red Sox I'm missing from every one of the Topps Traded sets of the day.  A project for my upcoming vacation perhaps.

Let's jump forward a decade or so with a pair of mid-2000s Sox.  Despite not being a very well-known player, Mark Bellhorn was so clutch at times for Boston around this time period.  I seem to remember him flipping back and forth between being a fan favorite, to frustrating the hell out of the fan base, somewhat regularly.

Next is Pokey Reese who, like Bellhorn, was an integral part of the 2004 curse-breaking team.  Reese was known much more for his glove than for his bat, and actually never played another Major League game after that '04 World Series win.  Not a bad way to go out I suppose.

Even more flagship needs with Troy O'Leary...

...another Jose Offerman...

...and a name I'd almost totally forgotten, Matt Clement.  At the rate John has been sending me stuff I'm going to have all of my flagship Topps team sets from over the years knocked out before long!

It wasn't all Topps in the package though.  I received nearly an entire team set of these SP Authentic Sox also.

I say nearly, because this is one of those odd sets that has serial-numbered cards at the end of the base set.

Every card after #100 on the checklist is serial-numbered, actually.

I did get all five of the Sox from the non-numbered portion of the checklist.

In my book, that's a complete team set!

There were quite a few newer releases to pair with all those throwbacks, like this nice Gypsy Queen card of Cy Young winner Rick Porcello.

Or this Heritage Chris Sale, depicted in front of that same fence and hedge row that so many of the Red Sox were in this release.

One of the coolest "cards" in the package though has to be this 1984 Topps Rub Downs.  These contained a bunch of mini temporary tattoos.  I'm psyched to have the one featuring the long-time color commentator for the team, Jerry Remy.  After combining this with some John had sent me previously I think I'm just one away from a complete team set of these maybe.

I know they're gimmicky, but I thought it was fun when Topps dedicated an Opening Day insert to ballpark food a couple of years back.  I'd never managed to get my hands on the Fenway Park Italian Sausage card though, until now!  I've certainly eaten more than my fair share of these at this point, I guess I might as well have it represented in my collection.

I also landed a pair of 2016 First Pitch inserts, the first of which features Jake Gyllenhaal and Jeff Bauman.  If you don't recognize Jeff, he turned the horrific injuries he suffered in the Boston Marathon bombing into a motivating factor and has gone on to author a memoir about his life.  That book became a film as well, in which he was portrayed by Gyllenhaal, so that's the tie-in there.

If you haven't heard the story of Brady Kahle, it will certainly make you smile.  He became famous for selling his cherished baseball card collection to help raise money for a couple of friends with cancer.  That spun into a Cards for a Cause campaign at local card shows that eventually raised tens of thousands of dollars.  Just awesome, and I can't think of anyone more deserving of having their very own Topps card.

I've got a nice little collection of Wally the Green Monster cards, mostly built from the Mascots insert in the Topps Opening Day set over the years.  Now I can add the 2018 version to it!

There were a small grouping of needed 2007 Topps cards included as well.  Remember when Topps did team cards like this?

World Series MVP Mike Lowell!

Fan favorite knuckle-baller, and current occasional commentator for the team's pre and post-game TV broadcasts, Tim Wakefield.

I even got a trio from the 2018 Topps set, for which my team set is still woefully incomplete.


I'm especially happy to have this one, as Vazquez doesn't have nearly the amount of cardboard out there that many of his teammates do.  He's been straight up tearing the cover off the ball this year, too.  One of the bright spots on the 2019 roster for sure, and a great photograph here.

To close it out, some 2019 Donruss.  I have exactly one card from this release, and it was sent to me in a previous trade package.

I feel the same way about this set that just about everyone seems to, Panini does what they can but the lack of logos is tough to say the least.

Nonetheless, I'll happily vacuum up any Red Sox that come my way.

Wait a second!  Two different Chris Sale cards?  Yup, one's a variation.  There's a ton of this in Donruss.  If you think Topps is bad with variation cards, go look at a Donruss checklist.

See what I mean, here's another.  This is different than the JD Martinez card (with the same number, from the same set) that I showed a couple of cards back.  What's your opinion on these?  Mine is that when Topps does the photo variations, they somehow feel special or significant.  They're fairly rare pulls, and they usually feature a very unique or odd photograph that differs greatly from the base version.  With Donruss though I don't really get that feeling.

One player I certainly don't mind getting two versions of however, is Rafael Devers!

Dude has been obliterating opposing pitching just about all year, and is still just 22 years old.  If he can keep up his current progression, or even just maintain his current level without a significant drop-off, for years going forward he could end up having an amazing career.  The ceiling is high for sure, and I'm really going to enjoy watching his career play out.  This pair puts me at 26 cards featuring Rafael, though I expect that number to climb in the near future.

So there's the package that pushed me over the 4,000 Red Sox cards mark.  I've said it before, but I have no idea what I did to deserve so much awesome cardboard.  Thank you John!!!  I am seriously indebted to you on the cardboard front at this point.  These additions to my collection were fantastic and much-appreciated!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...