As baseball card bloggers, many of us understandably tend to gravitate towards showing off our best or most interesting purchases and pick-ups. It's human nature. However, I'm willing to bet that most of us have made at least a few truly dumb purchases over the years that don't make a lot of sense. I know I certainly have, and today's post will cover one such purchase.
The card in question?
A 1957 Topps Dale Long, a nice enough card in and of itself, slabbed a PSA 6. This could be considered an upgrade I suppose to the well-worn raw copy of this card that also sits in my collection:
Yeah, this one's seen better days. Honestly though, I think it's a better fit for the way I collect nowadays than that clean, graded copy is. I spent $10 and change on the graded Long, despite already having this well-worn copy. There was one reason and only one reason that I did so. It allowed me to do this...
Card #1...
...card #2...
...and card #3 from the 1957 Topps set, all in a PSA 6 grade that pleased my OCD at the time.
While I'm thrilled to have both the Ted Williams and the Yogi Berra cards, the only reason I picked up the Long is because I thought it would be cool to just pluck the next card number from the set, one at a time over time, in the same grade to see how far I could progress with it.
This was extremely short-sighted on my part. I mean, following that logic through to conclusion, it doesn't take long to realize this was way too lofty a goal for me to shoot for. Looking at what a Mantle or Brooks Robinson RC alone go for in that grade should have helped me to realize what a fool's quest that idea was from the outset.
Unlike many collectors, I do enjoy graded cards, specifically PSA-graded cards. I've learned though that attempting an entire set in graded format is simply not for me. If someone offered me the $10.75 that I shelled out for this Dale Long for it today, I'd hand it over in a heartbeat and use those funds on something much more satisfying for my collection. Oh well, at least I came to this realization before I got any further than card #3!
How about you? What are some of the worst card pick-ups that you can recall from your own collecting experience?
2024 Topps Update Blaster
-
2024 Update: Saw this hit the shelves last week and I had to grab a box.
We'll kick it off with the presumed National League Cy Young, Chris Sale,
which ...
3 comments:
It's hard to say I regret buying so many game used/autograph cards during my teenage years, since that's just what I was into at the time. But when I think about all the other stuff I could've been buying with that money...it hurts.
Since you're one of the few bloggers who collects graded singles I'll keep my answer specific to that: I foolishly started a PSA-graded 1983-84 OPC hockey set while still working on the 1984-85 set that I've yet to finish. Why? Because I have a Wayne Gretzky base and a Scott Stevens RC. So I started picking up Islanders singles on 4 Sharp Corners (their cards were first in the set because they were Stanley Cup Champions in '83) until I realized that I have way too many graded sets unfinished and stopped at nine cards. I have a decent chunk of the set ungraded and if I thought I could get $40 for my 7 Islanders (including one PSA 10) I'd take it and buy the set unslabbed.
If one of your dumbest purchases only set you back $10.75, then I'd say you're doing A-OK. I've had plenty of "dumb" purchases that cost way more than this. Here are a few of my favorites... or should I say... least favorites:
An under the influence eBay purchase: https://sanjosefuji.blogspot.com/2014/04/dont-benadryl-and-bid.html
The token bid that ended up winning the auction: https://sanjosefuji.blogspot.com/2013/05/proud-to-be-american.html
I literally bought a box: http://sanjosefuji.blogspot.com/2011/10/im-ebay-idiot.html
Post a Comment