data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d6a9/6d6a95cb06b8c20cee803a2136c263a7274da62d" alt=""
That being said, 1960 Topps is one of my all time favorite sets, so when I saw this buyback card on eBay for under $2 I couldn't resist. I wasn't exactly expecting a Mickey Mantle or Hank Aaron given that you can basically see right through the wrapper, but I was pleasantly surprised to pull this...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d81cd/d81cd9fa6d5e31a3fe73451105ecd37e488b0b13" alt=""
I have to say though, part of me wishes I just picked up a standard '60 Topps issue card of Vinson. I'm not sure I like this trend of Topps branding their original cards with a big foil logo. What's your opinion? Are buyback cards a good way to keep people interested in older cards and the history of collecting, or are perfectly good vintage cards being ruined? I have to say that I like what Upper Deck did with their recent Goudey buybacks much better. Just include the vintage card and skip the foil stamp...
3 comments:
Vada Pinson! With a non-intrusive foil stamp! Nice!
To me, a Vintage is a Vintage. A big ugly foil stamp from 2009 adds a little character just like some kid drawing a mustache on it in 1963.
I could do without the foil stamp. If I could found a way to burn it off there without killing the card, I'd do it.
And that Pinson card is the best buy-back I've seen lately.
As long as the stamp isn't intrusive, it's acceptable I guess. I don't know how to deal with it if I'm trying to complete the set or something though.
Congrats on getting a good player, btw. That's easily the best Heritage buyback I've ever seen.
Word Verification: factis
Post a Comment